An
(2.1) | ||||
(2.2) |
for all
(2.3) |
where
(2.4) |
and it indicates when a point is inside or outside of
Frequently the different phases or components may be classified
into solid phases and fluid phases. An example is a porous rock.
In this case it is convenient to consider the two-component
medium in which all the solid phases are collectively denoted
as matrix space
As an example consider a clean quartz sandstone filled with
water. The sets
(2.5) |
of radius
(2.6) | ||||
(2.7) |
are the regions occupied by quartz and water, and
A generalization of the definition above is necessary
if the pore space is filled with two immiscible fluids
(see chapter VI).
In this case the fluid-fluid interface is mobile, and thus
all the sets above may in general become time dependent.
The same applies when the matrix
Finally it is of interest to estimate the amount of
information contained in a complete specification of
a porous geometry according to the definitions above.
This will depend on the spatial resolution
The irregular geometry of porous media frequently appears to be random or to have random features. This observation suggests the use of probabilistic methods. The idealization underlying the use of statistical methods is that the irregular geometry is a realization drawn at random from an ensemble of possible geometries. It must be emphasized that an idealization is involved in discussing an ensemble rather than individual geometries. It assumes that there exists some form of recognizable statistical regularity in the irregular fluctuations and heterogeneities of the microstructure. This idealization is modeled after statistical mechanics where the microstructure corresponds to a full specification of the positions and momenta of all particles in a fluid while the recognizable regularities are contained in its macroscopic equation of state or thermodynamic potentials. The statistical idealization assumes that the recognizable regularities of porous media can be described by a suitable probability distribution on the space of all possible geometries. Such a description may not always be the most obvious or most advantageous [56], and in fact the merit of the stochastic description does not lie in its improved practicability. The merit of the stochastic description lies in the fact that it provides the necessary framework to define typical or average properties of porous media. The typical or average properties, it is hoped, will provide a more practical geometric characterization of porous media.
Before embarking on the definition of stochastic porous media I wish to emphasize a recent development in the foundations of statistical mechanics [63, 64, 65, 66, 67, 68, 69] which concerns the concept of stationarity or homogeneity. Stationarity is often invoked in the statistical characterization of porous media although many media are known to be heterogeneous on all scales. Heterogeneity on all scales means that the geometrical or physical properties of the medium never approach a large scale limit but continue to fluctuate as the length scale is increased from the microscopic resolution to some macroscopic length scale. Homogeneity or stationarity assumes the absence of macroscopic fluctuations, and postulates the existence of some intermediate length scale beyond which fluctuations decrease [5]. Recent developments in statistical mechanics [63, 64, 65, 66, 67, 68, 69] indicate that the traditional concept of stationarity is too narrow, and that there exists a generalization which describes stationary but heterogeneous macroscopic behaviour. Although these new concepts are still under development they have already been applied in the context of local porosity theory discussed in section III.A.5.
Consider a porous sample (e.g. cubically shaped) of extension
or sidelength
(2.8) |
with integers
(2.9) |
indicate the presence of phase
An
(2.10) | ||||
where
(2.11) |
where the sum is over all configurations of the geometry.
Note the analogy between (2.11) and expectation values
in statistical mechanics.
The analogy becomes an equivalence if
A stochastic porous medium is called stationary and
homogeneous (in the traditional sense) if its distribution
(2.12) |
for all
A stochastic porous medium is called isotropic if its distribution is invariant under all rigid euclidean motions, i.e.
(2.13) |
for all
The set of possible geometries contains
Instead of discretizing the space it is possible to work directly with the notion of random sets in continuous space. The mathematical literature about random sets [70, 10, 71] is based on pioneering work by Choquet [72].
To define random sets recall first the concepts of a probability
space and a random variable [73, 74, 75].
An event
(2.14) |
A random variable is a real valued function on a probability space.
Random sets are generalizations of random variables.
The mathematical theory of random sets is based on the
“hit-or-miss” idea that a complete
characterization of a set can be obtained by intersecting
it sufficiently often with an arbitrary compact test set
and recording whether the intersection is empty or not
[70, 10].
Suppose that
A random set
(2.15) |
is the probability that the intersection
While the expectation value is not readily carried over to the
continuous case the concepts of stationarity and isotropy are
straightforwardly generalized.
A random set
(2.16) |
for all vectors
(2.17) |
for
(2.18) |
for
(2.19) |
for all rigid motions
(2.20) |
is introduced to denote the multiplication of sets by real numbers. The traditional definition of stationarity presented in (2.16) is restricted to macroscopically homogeneous porous media. It is a special case of the more general concept of fractional stationarity which describes macroscopic heterogeneity, and which is currently under development [63, 64, 65, 66, 67, 68, 69].
The mathematical definition of random sets in continuous
space is even less manageable from a practical perspective
than its definition for a discretized space.
A complete specification of a random set would require
the specification of “all” compact or “all”
closed subsets of