[629.2.1] There are several unsolved problems with the mathematical framework described in the introduction, particularly when the system is infinite. [629.2.2] The following examples of open problems stem from three different areas of theoretical physics.
Open quantum systems:
[629.2.3] For open quantum systems with infinite reservoirs
(12) |
written formally in terms of Hamiltonians
(13a) | |||
(13b) |
do not form groups
(14a) | |||
(14b) |
[page 630, §0]
because of memory effects accumulating from the mixing
of the system and the reservoir whenever there is nonvanishing
interaction [2].
[630.0.1] Here
Classical dynamical systems:
[630.0.3] In classical systems it is well known [14]
that the orbits in
the abelian algebra
Quantum field theory: [630.0.5] For quantum field theories or infinite systems the Stone-von Neumann uniqueness breaks down. [630.0.6] Haags theorem shows that the determination of a suitable representation of the canonical commutation relations becomes a dynamical problem, if the vacuum states for different couplings are different. [630.0.7] Non-normal states arise that yield representations assigning different values to global observables like densities. [630.0.8] Due to the problem of inequivalent representations it is not possible to represent the time evolution as a group of unitary transformation within a single representation, because the representation algebra may change into an inequivalent representation as time evolves.
[630.0.9] One objective of this paper is to suggest that these three open problems are, in fact, related to each other, even though they seem to be unrelated at first sight.
[630.1.1] The present article suggests that the common denominator of problems 2-2 associated with the mathematical framework described in the introduction is the concept of time flow as a translation, implicitly assumed on the left hand side of Equation (1). [630.1.2] The common origin of problems 2-2 emerges from studying the following two general questions associated with Equation (1).
[630.1.3] Are there global solutions of equation (1),
i.e. solutions for all
[630.1.4] If global solutions and hence a group of *-automorphisms on
[630.1.7] If global solutions of equation (1) exist, how can invariant solutions still change with time?
[630.1.8] Local stationarity (invariance) in time arises from the underlying dynamics. [630.1.9] Local stationarity in time is necessary, if thermodynamic observables such as temperature, pressure or densities are to provide an approximate representation of the physical system that changes slowly on long time scales. [630.1.10] Hence one has to study the set of stationary states that are invariant under the time evolution. [630.1.11] If the thermodynamic observables change then there must exist many invariant states and many possible time averages, i.e. the time averages are not unique.
[page 631, §1] [631.1.1] The objective of this paper is to introduce a framework in which questions concerning the abundance of time-invariant states and their embedding in the set of all states can be posed mathematically in a proper way.