[64.2.4.1] Consider now the direct problem with
[64.2.5.1] For strongly peaked
(5.1) |
for
(5.2) |
for
(5.2) |
for
[65.2.1.1] In the high-frequency limit (
(5.3) |
where
(5.3) |
for the real dielectric constant, and
(5.4) |
for real part of the conductivity.
[65.0.1.2] The sign in equation (5.3a)
has to be chosen such that
[65.0.2.1] In this subsection it will be shown that equation (3.2)
does indeed imply the existence of a percolation threshold,
also for general
[65.0.3.1] To identify the percolation transition,
consider the low-frequency limit.
[65.0.3.2] Expanding eq. (3.2) around
(5.5) |
for the effective dc conductivity
(5.6) |
is found.
[65.0.3.4] This equation for
(5.7) |
and the effective-medium value
[65.1.1.1] For the effective real dielectric constant
(5.8) |
[65.1.1.3] For
(5.9) |
where
[65.1.2.1] Equation (5.2) can be treated analogously
to the case of ordinary percolation.[30, 31][65.1.2.2] The effective conductivity
(5.10a) | |||
(5.10b) | |||
(5.10c) |
[65.1.2.5] [page 66, §0] For case (a) the solution of eq. (5.6) is obtained as
(5.11) |
where
(5.12) |
[66.1.0.1] The integral exists because of eq. (4.8)
and condition (5.10a).
[66.1.0.2] Note that eq. (5.11) is valid for all
[66.1.1.1] The situation is very different for case (c).
[66.1.1.2] If
(5.13) |
where the conductivity exponent
(5.13) |
is now no longer universal.
[66.1.1.3] It depends on the behavior of
(5.14) |
[66.1.2.1] For the real dielectric constant, eq. (5.8)
is valid below
(5.15) |
is obtained, where
(5.16) |
analogous to eqs. (5.11) and (5.12).
[66.1.2.5] Again, the expected value
in analogy with eq. (5.13b) for the conductivity exponent
[66.1.3.1] The central result of this section
is the identification of a percolation transition
underlying the random geometry
of porous media.
[66.2.0.1] The control parameter for the transition
is neither the bulk porosity
[66.2.1.1] In this section the scaling theory for the percolation transition[32, 33] is applied in the present context.[34] [66.2.1.2] Therefore, the present section goes beyond the effective-medium equation (3.2). [66.2.1.3] Scaling theory starts from the assumption that the complex dielectric constant can be written as
(5.17) |
with the scaling function
(5.18) |
for
(5.18) |
for
(5.18) |
for
(5.19) |
for
(5.20) |
for
(5.20) |
for
[66.2.2.1] For one-dimensional systems,
the effective-medium approximation is known
to be asymptotically exact for class (a) distributions.[31][66.2.2.2] If this remains true in higher dimensions,
then the scaling theory can be applied to porous media by identifying
the prefactors
[66.2.3.1] Consider now the case of finite frequencies
(5.21) |
for the conductivity, and
(5.22) |
for the dielectric constant, where
(5.23) |
and
(5.24) |
where
(5.25) |
and
(5.26) |
[67.1.0.6] These results predict a divergence of
[67.1.1.1] Most publications on the electrical properties of porous media discuss the phenomenological relationship[8] between dc conductivity and bulk porosity:
(5.27) |
called “Archie’s law”, which is usually written in terms
of the formation factor
[67.2.1.1] Sedimentary and related rocks arise from sedimentation
and subsequent compactification, cementation,
and other physicochemical processes.
[67.2.1.2] The bulk porosity
(5.28) | |||
(5.29) |
then eq. (5.19) implies that
(5.30) |
[67.2.1.12] This already resembles eq. (5.27).
[67.2.1.13] In particular, if it happens that
(5.31) |
as long as condition (5.10a) remains satisfied during the cementation process. [67.2.1.14] If the system falls under condition (5.10c), however, the cementation index becomes
(5.31) |
[page 68, §0]
[68.1.0.1] Note that
(5.31) |
[68.1.0.4] The surprising result is that the simplest form for
[68.1.1.1] A second interesting consequence of this section
is that it predicts similar scaling laws for the dielectric
constant in the high-porosity limit
(5.32) |
[68.1.1.4] Here the “dilution exponent”
(5.33) |
where
(5.33) |
[68.1.1.5] The exponents