[1.3.3.1] Let us start by recalling briefly the general theory of continuous time random walks [5, 7, 8]. [1.3.3.2] The basic equation of motion is the continous time random walk (CTRW) integral equation [16]
(2.1) |
[page 2, §0] describing a random walk in continous time without correlation between its spatial and temporal behaviour. [2.1.0.1] Here, as in (1.2), denotes the probability density to find the diffusing entity at the position at time if it started from the origin at time . [2.1.0.2] is the probability for a displacement in each single step, and is the waiting time distribution giving the probability density for the time interval between two consecutive steps. [2.1.0.3] The transition probabilities obey . [2.1.0.4] The function is the survival probability at the initial position which is related to the waiting time distribution through
(2.2) |
[2.1.0.5] The objective of this paper which was defined in the introduction is to show that the fractional master equation (1.2) is a special case of the CTRW-equation (2.1), and to find the appropriate waiting time density.
[2.1.1.1] The translation invariant form of the transition probabilities in (2.1) allows a solution through Fourier-Laplace transformation. [2.1.1.2] Let
(2.3) |
denote the Laplace transform of and
(2.4) |
the Fourier transform of , which is also called the structure function of the random walk [5]. [2.1.1.3] Then the Fourier Laplace transform of the solution to (2.1) is given as [5, 7, 8, 16]
(2.5) |
where is the Laplace transform of the survival probability.
[2.1.2.1] Similarly the fractional master equation (1.2) can be solved in Fourier-Laplace space with the result
(2.6) |
where is the Fourier transform of the kernel in (1.2). [2.1.2.2] Eliminating between (2.5) and (2.6) gives the result
(2.7) |
where is a constant. [2.1.2.3] The last equality obtains because the left hand side of the first equality is -independent while the right hand side is independent of .
[2.1.3.1] From (2.7) it is seen that the fractional master equation characterized by the kernel and the order corresponds to a special class of space time decoupled continuous time random walks characterized by and . [2.1.3.2] This correspondence is given precisely as
(2.8) |
and
(2.9) |
with the same constant appearing in both equations. [2.2.0.1] Not unexpectedly the correspondence defines the waiting time distribution uniquely up to a constant while the structure function is related to the Fourier transform of the transition rates.
[2.2.1.1] To invert the Laplace transformation in (2.8) and exhibit the form of the waiting time density in the time domain it is convenient to introduce the Mellin transformation
(2.10) |
for a function . [2.2.1.2] The Mellin transformed waiting time density is obtained as
(2.11) |
where denotes the Gamma function. [2.2.1.3] To obtain (2.11) from (2.8) the relation between Laplace and Mellin transforms
(2.12) |
the special result
(2.13) |
and the general relation
(2.14) |
valid for have been employed. [2.2.1.4] Using the definition of the general -function given in the appendix one obtains the result
(2.15) |
which may be rewritten as
(2.16) |
with the help of general relations for -functions [24]. [2.2.1.5] The dependence on the parameters and has been indicated explicitly. [2.2.1.6] From the series expansion of -functions given in the appendix one finds
[page 3, §0]
(2.17) |
showing that behaves as
(2.18) |
for small . [3.1.0.1] Because the waiting time density is singular at the origin. [3.1.0.2] The series representation (2.17) shows that the waiting time density is a natural generalization of an exponential waiting time density to which it reduces for , i.e. . [3.1.0.3] The series in (2.17) is recognized as the generalized Mittag-Leffler function [25], and may thus be written alternatively as
(2.19) |
[3.1.0.4] Of course the result (2.17) can also be obtained more directly, but we have presented here a method using Mellin transforms because it remains applicable in cases where a direct inversion fails [23]. [3.1.0.5] The asymptotic expansion of the Mittag-Leffler function for large argument [25] yields
(2.20) |
for large and . [3.1.0.6] This result shows that the waiting time distribution has an algebraic tail of the kind usually considered in the theory of random walks [12, 13, 14, 15, 16].