[3.1.1.1] The approach presented here is based on
the traditional theory presented in
Section 1
combined with the distinction between
percolating and nonpercolating phases
introduced in Refs. [14, 16, 15]
and discussed in Section 2.
[3.1.1.2] The volume fractions of the subsets
and
are denoted as
.
[3.1.1.3] Let
denote the porosity (volume fraction of
).
[3.1.1.4] Volume conservation implies the relations
![]() |
![]() |
(16a) | |
![]() |
![]() |
(16b) | |
![]() |
![]() |
(16c) |
where
are
volume fractions, and
are saturations.
[3.1.1.5] The water saturation is defined as
and the oil saturation
as
.
[3.1.3.1] As in the traditional theory the porous medium is again assumed to be macroscopically homogeneous so that eq. (4) holds. [3.1.3.2] The flows are slow, and hence also eq. (7) continues to hold without change. [3.1.3.3] For incompressible fluids one has now
![]() |
![]() |
(17a) | |
![]() |
![]() |
(17b) | |
![]() |
![]() |
(17c) | |
![]() |
![]() |
(17d) |
analogous to eq. (5a).
[3.1.4.1] The momentum transfer into phase from all the other phases
is assumed to be a simple viscous drag,
![]() |
(18) |
where the resistance coefficient quantifies
the viscous coupling between phase
and
.
[3.1.4.2] For the rigid rock matrix
[page 4, §0]
.
[4.0.0.1] Hence
is the momentum transfer from the
wall into phase
.
[4.0.0.2] Then
![]() |
![]() |
(19a) | |
![]() |
![]() |
(19b) | |
![]() |
![]() |
(19c) | |
![]() |
![]() |
(19d) |
where and
was used
because there is no common interface and hence no
direct viscous interaction between these phase pairs.
[4.0.0.3] Each
is a
-matrix.
[4.0.1.1] In the present approach the body forces are given by gravity plus capillary forces
![]() |
![]() |
(20a) | |
![]() |
![]() |
(20b) | |
![]() |
![]() |
(20c) | |
![]() |
![]() |
(20d) |
contrary to eqs. (8).
[4.0.1.2] The capillary body forces are responsible
for keeping the trapped fluids inside the medium.
[4.0.1.3] They are obtained as gradients of capillary potentials
![]() |
![]() |
(21a) | |
![]() |
![]() |
(21b) |
where the capillary potentials are
defined as
![]() |
![]() |
(22a) | |
![]() |
![]() |
(22b) |
with constants and exponents
.
[4.0.2.1] Next the stress tensor for percolating phases can be specified in analogy with eq. (6) as
![]() |
![]() |
(23a) | |
![]() |
![]() |
(23b) |
where and
are the fluid pressures.
[4.0.2.2] The stress tensor
for the nonpercolating
phases cannot be specified in the same way because
the forces cannot propagate in nonpercolating phases.
[4.0.2.3] Here it is assumed that these stresses are given by the
pressure in the surrounding percolating phase modified by
the energy density stored in the common interface with the
surrounding percolating phases.
[4.0.2.4] This suggests an Ansatz [4]
![]() |
![]() |
(24a) | |
![]() |
![]() |
(24b) |
where is the oil-water interfacial tension, and
the unknowns
are
the interfacial areas per unit volume of porous medium
between phases
and
, resp.
and
.
[4.1.0.1] (The factor
arises from the definition of
per unit volume of porous medium.)
[4.1.0.2] To avoid equations of motion for the unknowns
and
it is assumed that
geometrical relations of the form
![]() |
![]() |
(25a) | |
![]() |
![]() |
(25b) |
hold, where are prefactors assumed to be
constant.
[4.1.0.3] Thus for the nonpercolating phases
![]() |
![]() |
(26a) | |
![]() |
![]() |
(26b) |
will be used below. [4.1.0.4] Here
![]() |
![]() |
(27a) | |
![]() |
![]() |
(27b) |
are constants.
[4.1.1.1] The mass transfer rates must depend on rates of saturation change. [4.1.1.2] They are here assumed to be
![]() |
![]() |
(28a) | |
![]() |
![]() |
(28b) |
where are constants.
[4.1.1.3] The parameters
,
are defined by
![]() |
![]() |
(29a) | |
![]() |
|||
![]() |
![]() |
(29b) | |
![]() |
|||
![]() |
![]() |
(29c) | |
![]() |
![]() |
(29d) |
[page 5, §0] where are limiting saturations for
and
are equilibration time scales for
reaching capillary equilibrium.
[5.0.0.1] For simplicity
![]() |
(30) |
will be assumed below.