[4.1.2.1] Consider again the stationary limit
of fluid flow in
.
[4.1.2.2] On the scale of a macroscopic sample,
the viscous forces are dominated by wall friction
and quantified by Darcy’s law for single phase flow
![]() |
(20) |
where is the magnitude of the (superficial) Darcy velocity,
is the phase velocity of the (interstitial) fluid,
and
is the magnitude of the viscous pressure drop
across a region of length
.
[4.1.2.3] Here
is the fluid viscosity,
is the (absolute)
permeability and
the porosity of the porous medium.
[4.1.3.1] The generalization of Darcy’s law to two immiscible fluids
requires some assumptions.
[4.1.3.2] Let ,
denote the fluid configuration
inside the porous medium at some initial time
and consider flooding at constant injection rates
,
or
,
with water or oil.
[4.1.3.3] It is observed experimentally and then assumed theoretically that
for long times
the total volume fractions
![]() |
(21a) | ||
![]() |
(21b) |
approach constant limiting values.
[4.2.0.1] The values of ,
will depend on the phase pressures
,
.
[4.2.0.2] Because the injection rates are constant the homogenized
phase velocities
,
approach constant values.
[4.2.0.3] Specifically,
![]() |
![]() |
(22a) | |||||
![]() |
![]() |
(22b) |
because ,
for water flooding
and
,
for oil flooding.
[4.2.0.4] Under these assumptions Darcy’s law is generalized from
single phase flow to two-phase flow as
discussed in [33, 34, 35, 36, 37] to
![]() |
(23) |
where indicates the two phases and the
relative permeability functions
,
quantify the change
in permeability for phase
due to presence of the second phase.
[4.2.0.5] Note that the asymptotic water configuration
must be path connected and percolating from
inlet and outlet
in case (22a) and the same holds
for
in case (22b).
2: Limitations and previously unnoticed
implicit assumptions for the validity of
(23) were first addressed in
[15] and
then formulated mathematically and explicitly as
the residual decoupling approximation in
[18, 19, 20].
[4.2.1.1] The asymptotic pressure difference for
reflects microscopic capillarity
on macroscales.
[4.2.1.2] The difference is assumed to depend only on saturation
![]() |
(24) |
but not on the phase velocities
although dynamic capillary
effects have been observed [38, 39].
[4.2.1.3] The function is called capillary pressure
and
is its dimensionless form.
[4.2.1.4] The functions
and
are defined
on the interval
.
[4.2.1.5] The parameters
,
, defined as solutions of the equations
![]() |
(25a) | ||
![]() |
(25b) |
are the irreducible water saturation and the
residual oil saturation
.
[4.2.1.6] Both parameters
and
are
assumed to be small but nonvanishing, i.e.
and
.
[4.2.1.7] With
and
the parameter
in eq. (24)
is defined as
![]() |
(26) |
[page 5, §0]
[5.1.0.1] If there is hysteresis, so that the values
differ, then
will be used.
[5.1.0.2] The dimensionless capillary pressure function
can be positive and negative.
[5.1.0.3] The relative permeabilities are positive and monotone functions.
[5.1.1.1] The force balance between the viscous and capillary forces
of macroscale two-phase flow
can now be expressed either as a function of ,
and
![]() |
![]() |
(27a) | |||
![]() |
(27b) | ||||
![]() |
(27c) | ||||
![]() |
![]() |
(27d) |
or as a function of and the macroscopic
capillary number
in the last two equalities.
[5.1.1.2] The macroscopic capillary number
is defined as in [9] by
![]() |
(28) |
and it depends not only on fluid properties,
but also on properties of the porous medium
such as porosity and permeablity.
[5.1.1.3] Equation (27) seems to be a
new result that has been overlooked so far.
[5.1.1.4] Note that does not explicitly depend on the
interfacial tension
between the
two phases and that
the quantity
with
is dimensionally not a velocity, but a specifc action,
i.e. action per unit mass.
[5.1.1.5] For a derivation of
from the traditional
macroscale equations of motion see [32, 9].