Microscopic equations of motion for two-phase flow in porous media are
commonly given as Stokes (or Navier-Stokes) equations for two
incompressible Newtonian fluids with no-slip and stress-balance
boundary conditions at the interfaces [342, 270, 322].
In the following the wetting fluid
(water) will be denoted by a subscript while the nonwetting
fluid (oil) is indexed with
. The solid rock matrix, indexed
as
, is assumed to be porous and rigid. It fills a closed subset
of three dimensional space. The pore space
is
filled with the two fluid phases described by the two closed subsets
which are in general time
dependent, and related to each other through the condition
.
Note that
is independent of time because
is rigid
while
and
are not.
The rigid rock surface will be denoted as
, and the
mobile oil-water interface as
.
A standard formulation of pore scale equations of motion for
two incompressible and immiscible fluids flowing through a porous
medium are the Navier-Stokes equations
![]() |
(6.1) |
and the incompressibility conditions
![]() |
(6.2) |
where are the velocity fields
for water and oil,
are the
pressure fields in the two phases,
the densities,
the dynamic viscosities, and
the gravitational constant. The vector
denotes
the coordinate vector,
is the time,
the gradient operator,
the Laplacian and the superscript
denotes transposition. The gravitational force is directed
along the
-axis and it represents an external body force.
Although gravity effects are often small for pore scale processes
(see eq. (6.37) below), there has recently been
a growing interest in modeling gravity effects also at the pore
scale [343, 245, 246, 42].
The microscopic formulation is completed by specifiying an initial
fluid distribution and boundary conditions.
The latter are usually no-slip boundary conditions at solid-fluid
interfaces,
![]() |
(6.3) |
as well as for the fluid-fluid interface,
![]() |
(6.4) |
combined with stress-balance across the fluid-fluid interface,
![]() |
(6.5) |
Here denotes the water-oil interfacial tension,
is the curvature of the oil-water interface and
is a unit normal to it. The stress tensor
for the
two fluids is given in terms of
and
as
![]() |
(6.6) |
where the symmetrization operator acts as
![]() |
(6.7) |
on the matrix and
is the identity matrix.
The pore space boundary is given and fixed while
the fluid-fluid interface
has to be determined
selfconsistently as part of the solution.
For
or
the above formulation
of two phase flow at the pore scale reduces to the standard formulation
of single phase flow of water or oil at the pore scale.
The pore scale equations of motion given in the preceding section contain a self contradiction. The problem arises from the system of contact lines defined as
![]() |
(6.8) |
on the inner surface of the porous medium. The contact lines must in general slip across the surface of the rock in direct contradiction to the no-slip boundary condition Eq. (6.3). This selfcontradiction is not specific for flow in porous media but exists also for immiscible two phase flow in a tube or in other containers [344, 345, 346].
There exist several ways out of this classical dilemma depending
on the wetting properties of the fluids. For complete and uniform
wetting a microscopic precursor film of water wets the entire
rock surface [344].
In that case and thus
![]() |
(6.9) |
the problem does not appear.
For other wetting properties a phenomenological slipping model
for the manner in which the slipping occurs at the contact line
is needed to complete the pore scale description of two phase
flow.
The pheneomenological slipping models describe the region around
the contact line microscopically. The typical size of this region,
called the “slipping length”, is around m.
Therefore the problem of contact lines is particularly acute
for immiscible displacement in microporous media, and the
Navier-Stokes description of the previous section
does not apply for such media.
Given a microscopic model for contact line slipping the next step is to evaluate the relative importance of the different terms in the equations of motion at the pore scale. This is done by casting them into dimensionless form using the definitions
![]() |
(6.10) |
![]() |
(6.11) |
![]() |
(6.12) |
![]() |
(6.13) |
![]() |
(6.14) |
![]() |
(6.15) |
where is a microscopic length,
is a microscopic velocity and
denotes the dimensionless equivalent of the quantity
.
With these definitions the dimensionless equations of motion on the pore scale can be written as
![]() |
(6.16) |
![]() |
(6.17) |
with dimensionless boundary conditions
![]() |
(6.18) |
![]() |
(6.19) |
![]() |
(6.20) |
In these equations the microscopic dimensionless ratio
![]() |
(6.21) |
is the Reynolds number, and
![]() |
(6.22) |
is the kinematic viscosity which may be interpreted as a specific action or a specific momentum transfer. The other fluid dynamic numbers are defined as
![]() |
(6.23) |
for the Froude number, and
![]() |
(6.24) |
for the Weber number. The corresponding dimensionless ratios for the oil phase are related to those for the water phase as
![]() |
(6.25) |
![]() |
(6.26) |
by viscosity and density ratios.
Table IV gives approximate values for densities, viscosities and surface tensions under reservoir conditions [47, 48]. In the following these values will be used to make order of magnitude estimates.
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
---|---|---|---|---|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
Typical pore sizes in an oil reservoir are of order
and microscopic fluid velocities
for reservoir floods range around
. Combining these
estimates with those of Table IV shows that the dimensionless ratios
obey
. Therefore, the
pore scale equations (6.16) reduce to the simpler Stokes form
![]() |
(6.27) |
where
![]() |
(6.28) |
is the microscopic capillary number of water, and
![]() |
(6.29) |
is the microscopic “gravity number” of water. The capillary number is a measure of velocity in units of
![]() |
(6.30) |
a characteristic velocity at which the coherence of the oil-water interface is destroyed by viscous forces. The capillary and gravity numbers for the oil phase can again be expressed through density and viscosity ratios as
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
(6.31) | |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
(6.32) |
Many other dimensionless ratios may be defined. Of general interest are dimensionless space and time variables. Such ratios are formed as
![]() |
(6.33) |
which has been called the “gravillary number” [47, 48].
The gravillary number becomes the better known bond number if the
density is replaced with the density difference
.
The corresponding length
![]() |
(6.34) |
separates capillary waves with wavelengths below from
gravity waves with wavelengths above
.
A dimensionless time variable is formed from the gravillary and
capillary numbers as
![]() |
(6.35) |
where
![]() |
(6.36) |
is a characteristic time after which the influence of gravity
dominates viscous and capillary effects.
The reader is cautioned not to misinterpret the value of
in Table V below as an indication that gravity forces dominate
on the pore scale.
Table V collects definitions and estimates for the dimensionless groups
and the numbers and
characterizing the oil-water system.
Quantity | Definition | Estimate |
---|---|---|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
For these estimates the values in Table IV together with the above
estimates of and
have been used. Table V shows that
![]() |
(6.37) |
and hence capillary forces dominate on the pore scale [333, 2, 47, 48].
From the Stokes equation (6.27) it follows immediately that for low
capillary number floods () the viscous term
as well as the shear term in the boundary condition (6.20) become
negligible. Therefore the velocity field drops out, and the problem
reduces to finding the equilibrium capillary pressure field.
The equilibrium configuration of the oil-water interface then defines
timeindependent pathways for the flow of oil and water.
Hence, for flows with microscopic capillary numbers
an improved methodology for a quantitative description of
immiscible displacement from pore scale physics requires
improved calculations of capillary pressures from the pore
scale, and much research is devoted to this topic
[347, 348, 246a].