[1283.4.1] The Debye relaxation model describes the electric relaxation of
dipoles after switching an applied electric field [21].
[1283.4.2] The normalized relaxation function ,
which corresponds to the polarization,
obeys the Debye law
![]() |
(1) |
[page 1284, §0]
with the relaxation time and initial condition
.
[1284.0.1] The response function, i.e. the dynamical dielectric susceptibility,
is related to the relaxation function via [17]
![]() |
(2) |
[1284.0.2] In the following discussions we focus on Laplace transformed quantities.
[1284.0.3] We use the Laplace transformation of
![]() |
(3) |
where and
is the frequency.
[1284.0.4] Rewriting equation (2) in frequency space and
using
leads to
![]() |
(4) |
the well known Debye susceptibility.
[1284.0.5] In experiments one measures not the normalized quantity ,
but instead
![]() |
(5) |
where and
are the dynamical
susceptibilities at low, respectively high frequencies.
[1284.1.1] The Debye model is not able to describe the experimental data well,
because experimental relaxation peaks are broader and asymmetric.
[1284.1.2] For this reason other fitting functions were proposed such as the
Cole-Cole [22], Cole-Davidson [23]
and Havriliak-Negami [16] expressions.
[1284.1.3] Their normalized forms have typically 2 or 3 parameters
(see table 1) and
they were introduced purely phenomenologically to fit the data.
[1284.1.4] This can be considered as a drawback.
[1284.1.5] These functions with three parameters
are able to fit the data over a range of at most
decades (Havriliak-Negami).
[1284.1.6] To fit a broader frequency range
several functions are commonly added.
[1284.1.7] A combination of one Havriliak-Negami expression
plus one Cole-Cole form results in 6 fit parameters.
functional
form |
number of parameters |
|
---|---|---|
Cole-Cole | ![]() |
2 |
Cole-Davidson | ![]() |
2 |
Havriliak-Negami | ![]() |
3 |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |