[1287.5.1] In [20]
we obtained the analytical solution of a fractional differential equation
of rational order, which we use to analyze our fitting results
for model A and model B.
[1287.5.2] For a general solution of equations (11) and (12)
with arbitrary real see [35].
[1287.5.3] The restriction to rational
is not a drawback,
because we can approximate
and
by a rational value on a grid between 0 and 1.
[1287.5.4] This number of grid points is chosen to be 20, which keeps computation
times reasonably limited as the computing time increases quadratically
with the lowest common denominator of
with 1.
[page 1288, §1]
[1288.1.1] The solution for for model B is a sum
of Mittag-Leffler type functions:
![]() |
(14) |
where is the smallest number for which both
and
are integers.
[1288.1.2] The coefficients
are the zeros of the characteristic polynomial
![]() |
(15) |
the function is defined as [36]
![]() |
(16) |
[1288.1.3] The coefficients are the solutions of
the linear system of equations
![]() |
(17) | |||
![]() |
(18) | |||
![]() |
(19) |
[1288.1.4] This solution is only valid if all the roots
of the characteristic polynomial in (15)
are distinct, which is checked in the computations.
[1288.1.5] Because the linear system of equations (17)-(19) is
underdetermined we choose one fundamental solution for
and a
multiplication factor for
such that
.
[page 1289, §1]
[1289.1.1] The analytical solutions are plotted
for glycerol at (Fig. 7).
[1289.1.2] The fitting values for
for model A are
and
.
[1289.1.3] Both values lie in the time interval where the relaxation occurs,
which confirms the interpretation of these fitting parameters as relaxation times.
[1289.1.4] For model B the fitted times are
and
.
[1289.1.5] So
marks the onset of the relaxation and
the end.
[1289.2.1] We note that the fractional derivatives appearing in
the initial value problem (7)
can be generalized to fractional derivatives
of arbitrary type introduced in
[29]
and defined as
![]() |
(20) |
[1289.2.2] For the case it reduces to the Riemann-Liouville
fractional derivative, while for
to the
Liouville-Caputo-type derivative [33].
[1289.2.3] Because
![]() |
(21) |
the solution of our initial value problem does not change by replacing
the Riemann-Liouville fractional derivatives with these generalized
Riemann-Liouville fractional derivatives of type .